Kseniia Sobchak: Quota allocation for women in any form is humiliating

What is the gender equality and what determines gender relations in Russia? What is the dominant vision of Ukraine among the ruling and opposition forces in Moscow? In which direction the protest movement is going to develop in Russia? Ksenia Sobchak, the social activist from Russia, answered and discussed these and other questions during the videoconference held by the IWP. The event took place under the “Virtual Forum of Global Women Leaders ” supported by Internews.The transcript of the discussion is available in Russian only.

IWP held the videoconference with Rebecca Harms

On October 10th, at 11 a.m., IWP hoeld the videoconference with Rebecca Harms, a member of the European Parliament, the co-president of the Greens-European Free Alliance group in the EP.Ms. Harms is also a deputy head of the European Parliament Mission, which is aimed at observing current parliamentary elections in Ukraine.

In the course of the event, the questions of gender equality in the EU, perceptions of forthcoming parliamentary elections, and co-operation between Ukraine and the EU will be discussed.

This event is conducted within the project Virtual Forum of Global Female Leaders which is supported by Internews and in partnership with the Carnegie Europe (Brussels).

IWP held the videoconference with Rebecca Harms

On October 10th, at 11 a.m., IWP hoeld the videoconference with Rebecca Harms, a member of the European Parliament, the co-president of the Greens-European Free Alliance group in the EP.Ms. Harms is also a deputy head of the European Parliament Mission, which is aimed at observing current parliamentary elections in Ukraine.
In the course of the event, the questions of gender equality in the EU, perceptions of forthcoming parliamentary elections, and co-operation between Ukraine and the EU will be discussed.
This event is conducted within the project Virtual Forum of Global Female Leaders which is supported by Internews and in partnership with the Carnegie Europe (Brussels).

{1}{2}{3}{4}{6}{7}{8}{9}

Panel discussion in the “Weimar triangle” format plus Ukraine in the IWP

On October 15th at 10 a.m.,
the Institute of World Policy organizes an annual panel discussion within the framework of the “Weimar Triangle” on “Major Challenges European integration of Ukraine on the eve of parliamentary elections.”The heads of diplomatic missions of “Weimar Triangle” in Ukraine will participate in the discussion: Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary of Germany to Ukraine Christoph Weil, Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary of France to Ukraine Alain Remy, Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary of Poland to Ukraine Henryk Litwin and the Deputy Minister for Foreign Affairs of Ukraine Andrei Olefirov

The discussion in the format of “Weimar Triangle” is a traditional event held by the IWP with the participation of leading Ukrainian experts and journalists every fall. This year the format is expanded due to the participation of the representative of the MFA of Ukraine
{8}
{1}
{2}

{3}

{7}

{6}
{5}

{4}

Presentation and discussion of the analytical note on “Transnistria: the solution from the bottom up”

There have been a presentation and discussion of the analytical note on “Transnistria: the solution from the bottom up” written by Nick Popesk and Leonid Litra on the 11th of October in the Institute of World PolicyThe project was presented by one of the co-writers of the note Leonid Litra, the deputy of Development and Social initiatives Institute “Vitorul”.
{4}{2}
Mr Litra has emphasized that the conflict in Transnistria will not be resolved in a diplomatic way, instead the policy “from the bottom” should be used, which will allow for the de-facto reintegration of civilians and elite. The expert underpinned that the European Union has to become an active actor in this process, in order to reinforce the confidence between Moldova and Transnistria, by reforming the peacekeeping agreements and involving the region to EU-Moldova cooperation. However, according to Moldovian expert, the most important contribution of the EU to the process of resolution of the conflict could be the support of the euro integration of Moldova by the process of smoothening the visa regime and creation of free trade zones. Leonid Litra also has emphasized the special role of Ukraine as an actor, who is able to positively influence the resolution of the conflict in the region.

{1}
{3}{6}{5}{7}{8}

Presentation of the policy paper “Priorities for Ukraine’s OSCE Chairmanship 2013” at IWP

The presentation of the policy paper «Priorities of the Ukraine’s OSCE Chairmanship 2013” took place on October 5, 2012 at the Institute of World Policy.The draft was presented by Matthew Rozhansky, deputy director of the Russia and Eurasia Program at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace in Washington, DC.

Matthew Rojansky, the deputy director of the Russia and Eurasia Program at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace (Washington D.C.)

{2}

In its recommendations for the future of Ukraine’s chairmanship in the OSCE author underscored that Ukraine has the institutional resources to achieve successful results and that Ukraine has to choose maximalist approach to the presidency of the organization and begin the process that Mr. Rozhanski entitled as a path of historical reconciliation efforts aimed at resolving ” frozen conflicts “in the region, where Ukraine has its position and interests, to ensure energy security in the region, and transparent investment climate. According to Mr, Rozhanski, those priorities do not contradict the official position of Kyiv.
At the same time, Mr. Rozhanski emphasized that it is necessary to focus on what is attainable and focus not exclusively on Ukrainian national interest but also to continue and promotes the holistic policy of development of the OSCE. Also the author stressed that any changes within the OSCE mechanisms of consensus may adversely affect the progress of the organization.
{1}
The participants of the discussion developed a set of recommendations for defining key priorities for the Ukraine’s Chairmanship in OSCE
{3}
Yevhenii Tsymbaliuk, Deputy Head of the OSCE Chairmanship Task Force, Deputy Director, MFA of Ukraine
{4}

Yevhen Bystrytskyy, Executive Director of the International Renaissance Foundation

Videoconference Kyiv-Tbilist at the Institute of World Policy

On Wednesday, October 3rd , the Institute of World Policy held the videoconference with Tbilisi. The primary topic of the discussion was the results of the recently-held parliamentary elections in Georgia.Leading political figures, experts and journalist were present in Tbilisi studio and took part in the discussion: Batu Kutelia, Deputy Secretary of the National Security Council, Gela Vasadze, journalist, editor, presenter on the channel “PIK,” David Darchiashvili, member of the Parliament (United National Movement), David Beritashvili, political scientists and Michael Tavhalidze, political scientist and journalist.

The event was supported by the Embassy of Georgia in Ukraine within the framework of the “Ukraine and Georgia” thematic panel executed by the IWP.

During the discussion, the experts underscored that Georgia and democracy in Georgia won as a result of recently-held parliamentary elections. Considerable attention was paid to the risk of possible reversion of the reforms; also, the caution was expressed that the destruction of institutions that have showed good performance in the course of the reform process may adversely affect the further development of Georgia. Overall, during the discussion, optimistic predictions were avowed about the future of the political party of Mikheil Saakashvili “United National Movement” (UNM) in the newly formed parliament. Experts also shared their thoughts about the causes of loss UNM, naming among others the campaign organized by the opposition coalition “Georgian Dream” on the eve of the election, which, according to experts, was based on compromising evidences, and, as noted by David Beritashvili, “the paradigm of free lunch”.

Experts also emphasized that although the president remains the strong figure on the political arena in Georgia, he will not aggravate the political crisis in the country. In addition, Georgian experts have expressed a concern about the variegated composition of coalition of “Georgian Dream” and its ability to implement the unified policy.{1}{3}{8}{4}{2}{5}{6}{7}

Institute of World Policy held a videoconference with Anne Applebaum

On September 27, IWP held videoconference with Anne Applebaum, a prominent journalist and historian.Ms. Applebaum spoke on wide range of topics such as European integration of Ukraine, image and perception of the country in the American media, gender equality in Ukraine and the world as well as the role of women in modern diplomacy.

Ms. Applebaum avowed that in the European Union does not hear clear message from Ukraine regarding the European vector of its foreign policy. The journalist said that the EU is tired from countries with high level of debt, corruption and underdeveloped economies. As for Ukraine’s image in the American media, Mrs. Applebaum affirmed that it is largely crafted by the case Yulia Tymoshenko that indicated authoritarian tendencies in the country. But at the same time, the journalist stressed that forthcoming parliamentary elections would be crucial for shaping the image of Ukraine abroad and in the United States in particular, “it is not as important who will be elected in as the result of these elections, as how peaceful and legitimate transition of power is going to be.”

During the discussion on the topic of the role of women in politics, Ms. Applebaum underscored that the growing influence of women in politics is a positive sign of changes within a society, because it indicates the level of its openness.

Mrs. Applebaum referred to the topic of democratization of post-totalitarian societies and the importance of the revival of civil society that is able to organize not just for political but also for social problems.

At the end of the discussion, Ms. Applebaum announced the release of her new book, “The Iron Curtain: Crushing of Eastern Europe, 1944-1956″ that analyzes stalinization processes in Central and Eastern Europe, namely the role of police institutions, media, and civil society organizations in these processes

The event was held as part of the “Virtual forum of global women leaders” supported by Internews, the U.S. Agency for International Development and the U.S. Embassy in London

Ann Applebaum: Everything looks not so bad in Ukraine from the Western point of view

On September 27, IWP held videoconference with Anne Applebaum, a prominent journalist and historian.Ms. Applebaum spoke on wide range of topics such as European integration of Ukraine, image and perception of the country in the American media, gender equality in Ukraine and the world as well as the role of women in modern diplomacy.

Ms. Applebaum underscored that the European Union is eager to hear a clear position from Ukraine on the European dimension of its foreign policy. The journalist stated that the EU was tired from countries with high levels of domestic debt and corruption and underdeveloped economies. As for Ukraine’s image in the American media, Mrs. Applebaum said that it is largely shaped by the case of Yulia Tymoshenko that demonstrate authoritarian tendencies in the country. But, at the same time, the journalist emphasized the importance of forthcoming elections: “Not so important, who Ukrainians will elect, but how peaceful and legitimate will the transition of power will be?”

Ms. Applebaum stressed on the growing influence of women in politics as a positive sign of changes within society as it indicates a high level of transparency.

Mrs. Applebaum also touched on topics of democratization in post-totalitarian societies and the importance of the revival of civil society that is able to associate not only for political purposes, but also to solve social problems.

At the end of the discussion, Ms. Applebaum announced the release of her new book “The Iron Curtain: crushing of Eastern Europe, 1944-1956,” which studies the Stalinization process in Central and Eastern Europe, namely the role of state coercion, media, civil society organizations in these processes.

The event was held under the “Virtual Forum global female leaders with the support of Internews, the U.S. Agency for International Development and the U.S. Embassy in London.

{1}{2}{3}{4}{5}

IWP presented the survey “TOP-10 most post-Soviet politicians of Ukraine, Georgia and Moldova”

Institute of World Policy held a presentation of the survey “Top-10 most post-Soviet politicians of Ukraine, Georgia and Moldova.”The event was executed within the framework “How to get rid of Post-Sovietness?” that is being implemented in partnership with the Georgian Foundation for Strategic and International Studies (Tbilisi, Georgia), the Institute for Development and Social Initiatives “Viitorul” (Chisinau, Moldova) and with support of the Black Sea Trust (German Marshall Fund of the US).
The project was attended by Ukrainian politicians, representatives of non-governmental organizations, experts and journalists. The expert survey was presented by Alyona Getmanchuk, director of the Institute of World Policy, Serhiy Solodky, first deputy director of the Institute of World Policy, Leonid Litra, deputy-director of the Institute for Development and Social Initiatives “Viitorul.” Also, Volodymyr Fesenko, head of the Center for Applied Studies “Penta” and Yevgen Golovaha, Deputy Director of the Institute of Sociology, shared their expert opinions on the survey.{10}

According to the survey, Viktor Yanukovych was rated as the most post-Soviet politician of Ukraine. The Georgian ranking was topped by the leader of opposition Nino Burdzhinadze. And, the first place of the Moldovan survey was taken by its former President Vladimir Voronin.

{1}

{2}

{3}

{4}
{5}

{6}

{7}

{8}

{9}